A political decision now threatens to upend clean energy investment, as the Trump administration seeks to withdraw approval for two major offshore wind projects tied to Iberdrola in Massachusetts.
Washington, September 2025
The U.S. Department of Justice has formally announced its intention to cancel federal authorization for Avangrid’s New England Wind project off the coast of Massachusetts by early October. Avangrid, a U.S. affiliate of Spain’s Iberdrola, secured approval for the initiative under the Biden administration just a year ago. The project is designed to generate electricity for nearly 900,000 households and has been considered a cornerstone of regional climate targets. The move reflects a broader push by the current administration to curb offshore wind expansion nationwide and reassert reliance on fossil fuels.
In addition to the New England Wind case, Washington is also reviewing a second Iberdrola project known as SouthCoast Wind, signaling that the policy reversal is not limited to a single site but part of a wider strategy shift. For investors and local communities, this creates uncertainty not only about the fate of Iberdrola’s ventures but also about the future of clean energy in the U.S.
President Trump has long criticized wind energy as costly, inefficient and aesthetically damaging. These criticisms, previously voiced during his first term, have now been elevated into a regulatory offensive with potential to reshape the renewable landscape. His administration argues that wind projects inflate energy costs and undermine energy independence, while opponents see the campaign as ideological and regressive.
Regional leaders have not remained silent. Massachusetts Governor Maura Healey urged the administration to stop undermining offshore wind, warning that blocking projects jeopardizes job creation, delays emission reduction goals and sends a chilling signal to investors. Her remarks reflect growing concern among state governments that federal hostility to renewables could derail years of local planning and investment.
Industry analysts warn of significant consequences. Global investors had already scaled back offshore wind commitments in the U.S. because of legal and logistical hurdles, with several firms redirecting capital toward Europe, where regulatory environments remain more favorable. The potential cancellation of Iberdrola’s projects could accelerate this trend, leaving the American clean energy sector trailing behind in both innovation and deployment.
Iberdrola, through its U.S. subsidiary Avangrid, has tried to downplay the damage, stating that its long-term growth strategy remains intact and that its projects in other markets, including the United Kingdom, France and Germany, continue to advance. Still, the company acknowledges that the reversal in the U.S. is a significant setback at a time when global competition for renewable leadership is intensifying.
The stakes are not only financial but also geopolitical. For the European Union, the weakening of U.S. renewable commitments could alter the balance in transatlantic climate diplomacy. For Asian markets, particularly China, which has ramped up its offshore wind capacity, the American retreat offers an opportunity to consolidate leadership in green technology and capture supply chains that the U.S. appears willing to abandon.
Scenarios ahead remain open. If federal authorities reconsider or lose in court, the projects may move forward, restoring some investor confidence. If the administration succeeds in halting them, the U.S. offshore wind sector could face a dramatic slowdown, with ripple effects on regional economies and global climate goals. A bifurcation could occur if European and Asian firms take advantage of U.S. hesitation by dominating the next wave of renewable energy infrastructure, cementing technological and financial leadership far from American shores.
The administration’s legal maneuver thus represents more than an energy policy adjustment. It crystallizes a broader struggle over the country’s direction: whether to embrace renewables as engines of innovation or to double down on fossil fuels under the banner of sovereignty and cost control. Billions in investment and tens of thousands of jobs now hinge on how that choice is resolved.
Phoenix24: clarity in the grey zone
La narrativa también es poder