Parliamentary alliances are shifting under pressure.
Brussels, March 2026.
For decades, the European Parliament operated under a powerful informal rule: the so called cordon sanitaire against the far right. The principle was straightforward. Mainstream parties avoided any legislative cooperation with political forces classified as extremist. Yet recent revelations suggest that this political barrier may be weakening inside the institutional architecture of the European Union itself.
A recent investigation indicates that the European People’s Party (EPP), the largest center right bloc in the European Parliament, collaborated closely with lawmakers linked to far right parties, including representatives of Germany’s Alternative for Germany (AfD), during negotiations on proposals aimed at tightening the European Union’s migration policy. According to the report, the cooperation occurred through both direct meetings among members of parliament and discussions within a political messaging group used to coordinate legislative positions.
The political context surrounding these contacts is critical. For months, negotiations between the EPP, the Social Democrats and the liberal Renew group had stalled over reforms related to migration management and asylum procedures. The stalemate created a legislative vacuum in which some members of the EPP began seeking support beyond the traditional centrist coalition in order to advance a proposal that had long been blocked in parliamentary committees.
The result became visible when a proposal focused on strengthening migrant return procedures secured sufficient support in a key parliamentary committee. The initiative includes controversial measures such as transferring asylum seekers to return centers located outside European Union territory while their deportation or repatriation cases are processed. The plan reflects a broader push within certain European political circles to externalize migration management beyond EU borders.
The involvement of AfD affiliated lawmakers immediately triggered political debate. The German party has long been described by analysts as part of Europe’s far right political spectrum and has generated repeated controversy over the past decade. Within the European Parliament, AfD representatives have typically aligned with parties positioned further to the right of traditional conservative formations, building influence through growing electoral support across several member states.
However, observers note that the episode is less about a single parliamentary maneuver and more about structural changes occurring within European politics. Across multiple EU countries, right wing populist parties have expanded their electoral base and in some cases entered governing coalitions or shaped national policy debates, particularly on migration, border security and sovereignty.
This broader shift is gradually reshaping the parliamentary dynamics of the European Union. For much of the bloc’s modern political history, legislation passed through stable alliances linking moderate conservatives, social democrats and liberals. That informal grand coalition allowed lawmakers to approve legislation without relying on support from parties considered outside the democratic mainstream. Yet the growing presence of radical right formations has begun to complicate that equilibrium.
Migration policy has emerged as the central battlefield in this transformation. Some factions within the EPP argue that stricter asylum and return policies respond to mounting pressure from European voters concerned about border control and social stability after years of migration crises. Other lawmakers fear that even tactical cooperation with radical parties risks legitimizing actors that many institutions previously sought to isolate.
The debate reflects a deeper dilemma for the European project. The European Union was founded on liberal democratic principles that emphasize human rights, rule of law and institutional moderation. At the same time, political leaders must respond to changing public sentiment and electoral pressures that increasingly prioritize security and migration control.
Another factor complicating the picture is the growing fragmentation of the European Parliament itself. Recent elections produced a chamber that is more pluralistic and polarized than in previous cycles. With traditional blocs losing automatic majorities, legislative coalitions now require more flexible negotiations and, occasionally, unexpected alliances.
From an institutional perspective, the situation illustrates the gradual transition of European politics toward a more pragmatic and transactional parliamentary environment. As ideological boundaries blur under electoral competition, established parties face difficult strategic choices. They must decide whether to maintain historical political red lines or adapt to a more fragmented legislative landscape.
What unfolded around this migration proposal may therefore signal a broader transformation underway in the European Parliament. It does not necessarily imply a permanent alliance between the EPP and far right forces. Nevertheless, it suggests that the long standing cordon sanitaire, once seen as a defining feature of European political culture, is entering a period of practical reconsideration.
In a continent navigating economic uncertainty, geopolitical tension and demographic pressure, even the unwritten rules that shaped European parliamentary behavior for decades may now be subject to renegotiation.
Phoenix24: clarity in the grey zone. / Phoenix24: clarity in the grey zone.