Historical disputes create new strains among wartime allies.
PRAGUE, CZECHIA — July 2026. Czechia’s Freedom and Direct Democracy party has proposed withdrawing the Order of the White Lion from Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, extending a regional dispute over historical memory that recently strained relations between Ukraine and Poland. The SPD, a member of the Czech governing coalition, wants the Chamber of Deputies to formally appeal to President Petr Pavel and request the removal of the country’s highest state decoration. SPD lawmaker Jindřich Rajchl said the initiative was inspired by Polish President Karol Nawrocki’s decision to revoke the Order of the White Eagle previously awarded to Zelenskyy. The party also plans to raise the matter during coalition negotiations, although the proposal faces significant legal and political obstacles.
Zelenskyy received the Order of the White Lion in October 2022 from then-President Miloš Zeman, several months after Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine. The award recognized his wartime leadership, his defense of Ukrainian sovereignty and his decision to remain in Kyiv rather than leave the country during the first days of the attack. At the time, Czech authorities presented Zelenskyy as a symbol of resistance and democratic courage, while Prague became one of Kyiv’s most active European supporters in military, diplomatic and humanitarian affairs. The proposed withdrawal therefore represents a marked symbolic challenge to an honor granted during one of the most decisive moments of the war.
The SPD argues that Zelenskyy has supported controversial interpretations of Ukrainian wartime history, particularly through the use of names and symbols associated with the Ukrainian Insurgent Army. Critics in Poland and other Central European countries accuse members of that nationalist formation of participating in massacres and other crimes against Poles, Jews and Czechs during the Second World War. In Ukraine, however, parts of the organization are remembered as symbols of resistance against Nazi Germany and Soviet domination, creating sharply conflicting national narratives. Rajchl maintained that Czechia should not allow its highest decoration to remain in the possession of a leader who, in his view, promotes historical symbols connected with violence against Central European populations.
The Czech president’s office has indicated that the SPD’s demand may not be legally enforceable through a presidential decision alone. According to the office of President Petr Pavel, neither the Czech Constitution nor existing legislation gives the head of state unrestricted authority to revoke a decoration once it has been granted. A state honor could be removed only following a final court judgment imposing the loss of honorary titles and decorations under conditions established by the Criminal Code. This interpretation substantially reduces the possibility that the proposal will produce an immediate institutional result, turning it primarily into a political statement directed at domestic voters and the wider regional debate over Ukraine.
The initiative follows a deeper diplomatic confrontation between Kyiv and Warsaw after Polish President Karol Nawrocki revoked Zelenskyy’s Order of the White Eagle over the naming of a Ukrainian military unit after figures connected with the Ukrainian Insurgent Army. Zelenskyy responded by returning the decoration to Poland, while former Ukrainian presidents Leonid Kuchma, Viktor Yushchenko and Petro Poroshenko also surrendered Polish honors in solidarity. Ukrainian officials argued that foreign governments should not determine whom Ukraine recognizes as national heroes, while Polish leaders insisted that historical reconciliation requires acknowledgment of atrocities committed against Polish civilians. Senior Polish government figures warned that escalating symbolic disputes between allied countries could ultimately benefit Russia by weakening regional unity.
The controversy illustrates how unresolved memories of the Second World War continue to shape contemporary diplomacy across Central and Eastern Europe. Poland and Czechia remain strategically important supporters of Ukraine, providing political backing, military assistance and logistical access during the war with Russia, yet domestic political movements increasingly use historical grievances to challenge that cooperation. Analysts have described demands to withdraw decorations as tools for mobilizing voters and constructing political narratives rather than measures likely to produce substantial legal consequences. Even when such proposals fail institutionally, they can influence public opinion, deepen diplomatic mistrust and complicate efforts to preserve a unified European response to the conflict.
For President Petr Pavel and the Czech government, the dispute creates a delicate balance between protecting national historical sensitivities and maintaining Czechia’s established support for Ukraine. The SPD can use the controversy to distinguish its position within the coalition, appeal to nationalist voters and question the symbols associated with Ukrainian state identity without necessarily forcing an immediate change in foreign policy. Pavel, a former NATO general who has consistently supported Ukraine, is unlikely to endorse a measure that his own office considers legally impossible. Nevertheless, the debate demonstrates that symbolic questions involving medals, military names and historical figures can become politically powerful even when they have limited practical consequences.
The future of the Czech proposal will depend on whether the SPD can secure parliamentary backing and persuade other coalition parties to place the issue before the president. Without a relevant court ruling, however, the Order of the White Lion is expected to remain with Zelenskyy regardless of any parliamentary appeal. The episode may therefore have greater significance as an indicator of changing political attitudes than as a realistic attempt to remove the decoration. As the war continues, disputes over historical memory could increasingly test the cohesion of the European countries that have formed Ukraine’s political and logistical support network.
Phoenix24 — Global news with clarity and perspective.