Every fragile pause reveals the limits of power and the weight of survival.
Tel Aviv, October 2025
U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance arrived in Israel under the fragile calm of a ceasefire that has, for now, outperformed expectations. After weeks of uncertainty and conflicting reports, the truce between Israel and Hamas has brought a temporary halt to the violence that devastated Gaza’s civilian infrastructure and deepened regional instability. Vance, speaking alongside Israeli officials, described the progress as “better than expected,” emphasizing that the United States will not deploy troops in Gaza but will continue to coordinate humanitarian and diplomatic efforts with allies in the region.
His visit, part of a broader Middle East mission, sought to consolidate a working framework for maintaining the truce while avoiding political fragmentation within Israel’s leadership. Washington’s role, he noted, is to sustain channels of mediation between Tel Aviv, Cairo, and Doha, while pressing for measurable improvements in humanitarian access. Independent monitors have confirmed that fuel deliveries and medical shipments have reached some hospitals in northern Gaza, though the situation remains precarious.
European diplomats view this ceasefire as a critical stress test for the regional order. The European External Action Service praised the involvement of Egypt and Qatar in maintaining dialogue, while analysts at the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute observed that international cooperation in Gaza has risen noticeably since early autumn. Their data suggest that European and North American support has doubled in logistical coordination, with Spain, Germany, and France contributing medical and reconstruction teams to border corridors.
In Washington, the Council on Foreign Relations interprets the ceasefire as part of a U.S. strategic recalibration—one that seeks to limit military overreach while preserving influence through economic and diplomatic leverage. The Biden administration’s decision to delegate negotiation authority to Vice President Vance illustrates the growing importance of second-tier diplomacy in complex conflicts where traditional statecraft faces diminishing returns.
Meanwhile, the Lowy Institute in Sydney highlights the role of so-called “middle powers” in stabilizing crisis zones. Australia, Japan, and South Korea have joined discussions about post-conflict reconstruction funds, linking their participation to broader Indo-Pacific security interests. This triangulation underscores how the Gaza ceasefire reverberates beyond the Middle East, shaping future frameworks for crisis response.
Inside Israel, the situation remains politically volatile. Some members of the coalition government criticize any agreement perceived as a concession, while humanitarian agencies warn that any breakdown could plunge Gaza back into chaos within days. Vance acknowledged these tensions, urging restraint and declaring that Washington’s patience “will not extend indefinitely” if armed groups breach the accord.
The ceasefire, though fragile, represents a rare pause in a war defined by asymmetry and exhaustion. Whether it evolves into a sustainable peace or collapses under pressure will depend on the capacity of all actors to balance vengeance with pragmatism—a calculus that has repeatedly failed in this region.
Phoenix24: facts that do not bend. / Phoenix24: hechos que no se doblan.